![us population density map transparent us population density map transparent](https://i.redd.it/zwhte13dx1o11.png)
Weird, but very good to know: you can open an Excel file in QGIS by just opening it as a vector layer.Īfter that, I used the ‘Random points in polygons’ command, under the Vector => Research tools to generate the dots. Joining the data was done in QGIS: I added both files, went to the properties of the geodata and added the join. I had to paste two columns in the Excel-file containing the population data together to do so. The first thing I had to do was to make sure both the geodata and the statistical data shared the same key to identify each sector, so I could join them together. But I wanted more recent data and so I got the population in every statistical sector on the first of January 2017 from Statbel. On average, they are 1,5 square kilometers in size, but they are much smaller in more populous areas.Ī shapefile of the statistical sectors is published on the Statbel website.įor my first experiments, I used data from the 2011 Census. In my country, the most detailed geographical entities at which statistics are published are the so-called statistical sectors. Here’s how I made a 1-dot-1-Belgian map with the open source and free QGIS, mostly following Tom Armitage’s great instructions. So I decided to make my first dot density maps. Every dot represents one cholera related death in a London neighbourhood in the 1850's 'The Global Hunt', a dot map published in the great ' Where the Animals Go' book, shows 1 dot for every recorded historical whale killing. The Racial Dot Map represent every American with a dot, colored by race 1.276 people in 1 square kilometer is very abstract, while one person, one baby or one lion is not: you can immediately picture them mentally. When looking at a map where one dot represents one person (or one new born baby, one lion, one …), the mental distance to empathize with what is depicted on the map is much smaller then when you are looking at an administrative area shaded with a color representing 1.276 inhabitants per square kilometer, for example. John’s second argument pro dot density maps is that they can provoke emotional resonance really easily. The map uses icons instead of dots, but the concept is the same. Here is an illustration of that:īoth maps are showing the results of the 2016 presidential election results, but while the first one (on his way to be hung on a White House wall) is a choropleth map greatly overemphasising big-area-but-low-population republican states, the second one is a dot density map showing the election result more accurately by representing every 250.000 voters with a symbol. John put into words really well what’s so good about them:ĭot density maps are self-normalizing: by showing densities (the number of people living somewhere, different nationalities spread out over a big city, number of sheep raised accross a country, …), as, well, densities of dots, you can overcome the biggest drawbacks of traditional choropleth maps. I like dot density maps too, but never really thought through why. One-person-one-dot maps and how to make themĪ couple of days ago, one of my favorite cartographers, Esri’s John Nelson declared his love for dot density maps.